Analysis of co2 emissions management performance in china at sub-province level

Bofeng Cai1, Weishan Yang1, Lixiao Zhang2, Yueyi Feng2

1 The Center for Climate Change and Environmental Policy, Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, Beijing 100012, China
2 State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Abstract


Sub-province (prefecture-level) regions are more fundamental and flexible in carbon mitigation and policy implementation in China compared to provinces and counties, due to their more manageable area than provinces, and more powerful governing capacity by means of regulations and standards than counties. Using the EDGAR database and prefecture boundary data, CO2 (carbon dioxide) emission management performances at the prefecture level in China were investigated using statistical analysis. The results demonstrate that the spatial pattern of China s CO2 emissions was mainly concentrated in certain key prefectures. The top ten prefectures in terms of per capita emissions are all concentrated along the coal mining belt in north China. Half of the prefectures (46%) in China have contributed more than 80% of total emissions, and roughly one third of the population lives in prefectures where annual per capita emissions are above the national average emissions level (5.7 ton CO2). Clustering analysis show that prefectures in China can be categorized into 6 groups, and half of the prefectures were in the low emission and low economy group. It is urgent for the prefectures in this group to make a low carbon transition so as to avoid the fate of high emission development. The implication of these findings for policymakers is that prefectures should be the focus of future strategies for low carbon development rather than provinces, and the selection of low carbon pilots need be based on the type of development, emissions intensity and their representativeness of certain category of prefectures.

Keywords


CO2 emissions; low carbon development; prefectures

Full Text:

 Subscribers Only