Municipal solid waste sorting and treatment schemes for the maximization of material and energy recovery in a latest eu member

Gabriela Ionescu1, Elena Cristina Rada2,3, Lucian Ionel Cioca4

1 Politehnica University of Bucharest, Department of Energy Production and Use, 313 Splaiul Independentei, Bucharest 6, Romania
2 University of Trento, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, 77 Via Mesiano, I-38123 Trento, Italy
3 University of Insubria, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, 46 via G.B. Vico, I-21100 Varese, Italy
4 Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Industrial and Management Engineering Department, 4 Emil Cioran, 550025 Sibiu, Romania

Abstract


This paper analyses mass and energy balances of some Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Systems (IMSWS) focusing on MSW sorting, treatment and energy recovery conversion chains suitable for the last entries into the European Union (EU). In particular the Romanian case-study has been developed as reference scenario. In this context the actions timelines for the case-study are immediate (S1A), midterm (S1B) and long term (S2). In the scenarios S1A, S1B a poor selective collection (SC) is considered of 3.5% and 9.94% respectively from the total MSW stream. The Residual Municipal Solid Waste (RMSW) is always sent to a biodrying process. Advanced mechanical sorting (AMS) treatments are applied in order to obtain Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF). A final industrial exploitation of SRF (S1A) or a gasification option (S1B) are considered as final treatments. Scenario S2 includes a proficient SC implementation for paper and cardboard, plastics, glass, metals and wood, Take back programs , RMSW biodrying, and SRF gasification. For the development of the calculations, one million tons of MSW were considered. The results show that the combination of proficient SC and Take back programs leads to a significant decrease in the annual waste disposal. Moreover the combustible material designated to energy recovery (S1A cement factory, S1B and S2 gasification) decreases by weight (S1A (53.7%), S1B (55.84%) and S2 (65.45%). In particular, without any pre-treatment (SC, Take back programs, mechanical sorting) of the RMSW stream by applying the its direct incineration, the Non Volatile Solids (NVS) landfill flow would be higher in comparison with all scenarios considered.

Keywords


energy; integrated scenarios; municipal solid waste; solid recovery fuel

Full Text:

 Subscribers Only